Bibliographie

- BATEMAN IJ, TURNER RK, “Evaluation of the environment: the contingent valuation method”, By CSERGE Working Paper GEC 92-18, 108p.
- BISHOP RC, HEBERLEIN TA, “Measuring values of extra market goods are indirect measures biased”, American Journal of Agricultural economics, Vol. 61 p. 926-930, 1979
- CARSON RT & all., “Contingent valuation: controversies and evidence”, in Environmental & Resource economics, 19 (2), p. 173-210, 06/2001.
- CARSON RT, OPPENHEIMER J, “The problem of strategic voting under approval voting – A reply”, American political sciences review, Vol. 79, p. 827-830, 1985.
- Carson RT, Flores NE, Martin KM, “Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: Comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods », Land Economics, Vol. 72, p. 80-99, FEB 1996.
- CLAEYS-MEKDADE C, GENIAUX G, LUCHINI S, « Approche critique et mise en Oeuvre de la méthode d’évaluation contingente : un dialogue entre économiste et sociologue », NSS, Vol. 5, N°2, p. 35-47, 1999.
- COOPER JC, HANEMANN M, “Referendum contingent valuation – How many bounds are enough”, American journal of agricultural economics, Vol. 76, p. 1246-1246, DEC 1994.
- DIAMOND PA, HAUSMAN JA, Contingent valuation, A critical Assessment, chap. 1: On contingent valuation measurement of non use values, 1993, MIT Press.
- Dietz T., Fitzgerald A., Shwom R., “Environmental values”, Annual review of environment and resources, Vol. 30 p., 335-372, 2005.
- GOKSEN F., ADAMAN F., ZENGINOBUZ EU., “On environmental concern, willingness to pay, and postmaterialist values - Evidence from Istanbul, Environment and behaviour”, Vol. 34, p. 616-633, 2002.
- HANEMANN WM, “Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses”, American journal of agricultural economics, Vol. 66, p. 332-341, 1984.
- HANEMANN M, LOOMIS J, KANNINEN B, “Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation”, American journal of agricultural economics, Vol. 73, p. 1255-1263, NOV 1991.
- HANEMANN, WM, “Willingness to pay and willingness and willingness to accept – How much can they differ?”, American economic review, Vol. 81 (3) p. 635-647, 06/1991.
- IGNATOW G, “Cultural models of nature and society - Reconsidering environmental attitudes and concern”, Environment and behaviour, Vol. 38 p. 441-461, 2006.
- JÚDEZ L., ANDRÉS R., PÉREZ HUGALDE C., URZAINQUI E., IBÁÑEZ M., « Évaluation contingente de l’usage récréatif d’une réserve naturelle humide », Cahiers d’économie et sociologie rurales, n° 48, 1998.
- LATOUR B, « Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world », in M. Mulkay K. Knorr-Cetina (eds.), Science observed, Perspectives on the Study of Science, London: Sage, pp.141-170.
- LUCHINI S., « De la singularité de la méthodes d’évaluation contingente », In Économies statistique, n° 357-358, 2002.
- MCFADDEN D, “.Contingent Valuation and Social Choice, American journal of agricultural economics, Vol. 76, No. 4, 689-708, November 1994.
- MCKENZIE J, “A Comparison of Contingent Preference Models”, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 593-603, 1993.
- MILANESI J, « La méthode d’évaluation contingente en question. Critique, requalification et illustration par la mesure de la demande en assainissement à Moshi (Tanzanie) », résumé de thèse, 7 p. - MILANESI J., « La nature mise à prix », in L’Economie Politique, n°38, 2008 (2).
- NOAA Panel’s Report on Contingent Valuation, Kenneth Arrow Robert Solow Paul R. Portney Edward E. Leamer Roy Radner Howard Schuman, 67 p., 1993.
- PIVOT A. VIVIEN FD., « A propos de la méthode d’évaluation contingente », in Nature Sciences Sociétés, Vol 7 n°2, 1999.
- PORTNEY P., « The Contingent valuation debate : Why economists should care », In The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8, No. 4, (Autumn, 1994), pp. 3-17.
- RABOTEUR J. et RODES M-F, « Application de la méthode d’évaluation contingente aux récifs coralliens dans la caraïbe : étude appliquée à la zone de Pigeon de la Guadeloupe », In La revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement VertigO, Vol7no1, mai 2006.
- THALER RH, “Legal Policy and the Endowment effect”, 1980.
- VEISTEN K, “Contingent valuation controversies: Philosophic debates about economic theory”, The Journal of Socio-Economics Vol. 36, p. 204–232, 2007.
- VENKATACHALAM L, “The contingent valuation method: a review”, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Vol. 24, p. 89 –124, 2004.
- YQ Z & L, “Valuing or pricing natural and environmental resources?”, Environmental science & policy, Vol. 8, p. 179-186, 2005.